Water Board mulls rate hikes

OKAMOTO
Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

Members of the island Water Board favored a 9.5% annual rate increase over options of 12% and 8% after a presentation Tuesday from consultants anticipating revenues and expenses over the next five years.

The rate increase, assuming the pass-through power charge increases on average 3% a year and the CIP energy charge stays the same, would take the bimonthly bill of a typical home with a 5/8 inch meter and 12,000 gallons per month water use from the current $140.64 to $199.30 in 2026.

The increase, which would, if implemented, go into effect in July, follows an increase last January of about 13%.

But there will be several more steps and opportunities for public input before rates actually change. The consultant’s five-year rate schedule offers a road forward, but it could change after a planned workshop on rate structures and a “true-up” sometime midway through the five year-period, said consultant Ann Hajnosz of Harris and Associates.

The increased charges would pay for baseline operations and maintain an operations and maintenance reserve of 60 days, while increasing spending on needed capital improvement projects and keeping debt ratios at healthy levels, said consultants.

“The vast majority of your capital program is renewal and replacement,” rather than increasing capacity, said consultant Karyn Johnson. “It’s really about balancing the necessary projects with the rate impacts are for the customers.”

The board voted unanimously for the middle of the three scenarios on the recommendation of Manager-Chief Engineer Keith Okamoto.

“We’re actually behind; we actually need to ramp up our repair and replacement projects,” Okamoto said. “The bottom line — we’ve got to make sure our bills continue to be paid (while saving) money to carry us through tough times.”

There is an increase in capital improvement spending in the proposed rates, but board member Benjamin Ney urged the water department to not get carried away. The Honolulu rail project is a cautionary tale about what happens if a project gets out of control once it’s too late to walk it back, he said.

“Once we commit to these projects we’re committed,” Ney said. “We have to be really careful about what capital projects we undertake.”

All capital projects are likely to cost more next year, said board member David De Luz Jr. There’s a strong demand for professional engineers, he said, and they’re commanding a high rate.

“Capital projects are going to run significantly higher than anticipated,” De Luz said.

The water bill includes an energy charge, a water consumption charge, a set standby charge and a power cost charge that fluctuates with the price of electricity. The water department, a semi-autonomous agency, doesn’t get tax dollars but is funded by charges for its water service.