Cases rest in murder trial

Swipe left for more photos

Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Sheri Lawson presents closing arguments in the murder trial of Eber Miranda Garcia Tuesday in Circuit Court. (Laura Ruminski/West Hawaii Today)
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Sheri Lawson presents closing arguments in the murder trial of Eber Miranda Garcia Tuesday in Circuit Court. (Laura Ruminski/West Hawaii Today)
Eber Miranda Garcia stands with his attorney Terri Fujioka-Lilley during closing arguments of his murder trial Tuesday in Circuit Court. (Laura Ruminski/West Hawaii Today)
Eber Miranda Garcia appears Tuesday in Circuit Court for closing arguments in his murder trial. (Laura Ruminski/West Hawaii Today).
Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

KEALAKEKUA — For a second time, a jury has begun to deliberate in the trial of a man accused of murdering his landlord almost four years ago.

On Tuesday, Deputy Prosecutor Sheri Lawson and Defense Counsel Terri Fujioka-Lilley delivered closing arguments to a jury in 3rd Circuit Court in the case for Eber Miranda-Garcia, accused of second-degree murder.

Eber Miranda-Garcia and his brother Marlon were arrested in June 2017 for the 2015 killing of Dolores “Lolo” Borja-Valle.

Eber and Marlon Miranda-Garcia were initially tried together in August 2018. After several weeks of testimony and presentation of evidence, it ended in a mistrial as jurors were unable to unanimously reach a verdict.

Many hearings have taken place since to prepare for the second trial. In December, 3rd Circuit Court Judge Robert D.S. Kim granted the request to sever the brothers’ cases. They are now being tried separately. Marlon Miranda-Garcia is scheduled for jury trial in July. He is also accused of second-degree murder.

Lolo’s body was found Aug. 9, 2015, dumped in a coffee field off Keopuka Mauka Road in Captain Cook. The victim’s truck was found abandoned in Ocean View the next day. Lolo lived downstairs from the Miranda-Garcia family in Holualoa at the time of the incident.

In her closing remarks Tuesday, Lawson told jurors it was a circumstantial case. With the evidence and testimony presented, she believes the state has met the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Eber Miranda-Garcia is guilty.

“This case is like a jigsaw puzzle,” Lawson said. “You need to focus on the evidence of the case. The pieces of evidence fit that the defendant killed Lolo.”

A key item of evidence was Eber Miranda-Garcia’s confession of the murder when he was arrested in 2017. Lawson explained the defendant told jurors in his confession why and how he killed Lolo — it was to protect his family.

Eber Miranda-Garcia’s confession states he killed Lolo after the 69-year-old threatened to take his family away from him. In the video, he tells detectives he used rocks and his hands to kill Lolo.

“On the stand, he said he made everything up, he was acting,” she said, recalling to jurors Eber Miranda-Garcia’s testimony last week.

Lawson pointed to various statements as well as his confession that corroborate evidence that he killed Lolo. The prosecutor added Eber Miranda-Garcia had the means. There are phone records that show he was in contact with his brother, Marlon, who the state believes assisted in disposing of Lolo and his truck.

“The defendant had the opportunity to kill Lolo,” Lawson said. “He knew his daily routine. In addition, he had the opportunity to clean up. They had opportunity to dump the body and the truck.”

Tower dumps on cellphone towers in Kealakekua and Ocean View were conducted as part of the investigation. As a result, it showed Eber Miranda-Garcia and his brother, Marlon, were in the same place at the same time during the timeframe that Lolo was murdered.

“That confession was the last thing that happened in this case,” Lawson said referring to the 2017 confession. “The phone evidence and times was all done before the confession. But the confession matched those times and evidence.”

Fujioka-Lilley opened her closing argument by stating Eber Miranda-Garcia didn’t kill Lolo. Evidence doesn’t show he took the body to Keopuka Mauka Road or dumped the truck in Ocean View.

“Police got turned around from the very beginning,” Fujioka-Lilley said in regard to the murder investigation. “Just because they say they have the right guy doesn’t make it so.”

Fujioka-Lilley told jurors her client didn’t have to testify to the court, but the Holualoa man took the stand last week over the course of two days to answer questions from the prosecutor’s office.

“He didn’t have to take a beating from the prosecutor, but Eber wanted to tell you what he was doing that night,” she said.

Fujioka-Lilley said Eber Miranda-Garcia didn’t know the facts of the case when he was arrested in 2017. By confessing the way he did, it allowed for his wife to be released to be home with their daughter.

Eber Miranda-Garcia is presumed innocent until the government proves otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt, the defense counselor said.

“You only need one,” Fujioka-Lilley said. “A doubt that rises in your mind — if it defies logic.”

Fujioka-Lilley told the jury there are various reasons to doubt the government’s case against her client.

That includes detectives believing the entire Miranda-Garcia family lied about brothers Himer and Marlon living in a room at Lolo’s house and conducting a tower dump on only a Verizon cellphone tower. Officers’ suspicion of the family because of their phone records that night also resulted in the Miranda-Garcias becoming the prime and only suspects in the case, she said.

“Mistakes and misinformation led police to conclude that my client killed Lolo,” Fujioka-Lilley said.

Fujioka-Lilley also pointed out to jurors Lolo had been in some kind of dispute in the parking lot at ChoiceMart in Captain Cook. However, no surveillance from nearby businesses was obtained. Detectives also didn’t get out and look at other coffee fields where Lolo worked in the Captain Cook area.

Fujioka-Lilley also addressed the state’s DNA evidence in the case.

“They were not looking for DNA evidence to who killed Lolo,” she said. “They already decided that.”

Fujioka-Lilley added there were other people’s DNA collected during the investigation of the case but was never tested.

“That shows you they were out to get a conviction,” she stated. “The DNA evidence can’t prove who killed Lolo.”

The jury will continue deliberations today.