Hilo business pays $65K in pregnancy discrimination case

Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

HILO — A Hilo business has agreed to pay $65,000 to settle a complaint made by an employee who alleged she was fired because she became pregnant.

HILO — A Hilo business has agreed to pay $65,000 to settle a complaint made by an employee who alleged she was fired because she became pregnant.

The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission on Tuesday announced the settlement, which also required the business to adopt a nondiscrimination policy and provide nondiscrimination training for its supervisors and managers.

The commission did not disclose the name of the woman or the business.

In her complaint, the woman alleged that her employer failed to reinstate her after a pregnancy-related disability leave, denied her a reasonable accommodation for her pregnancy-related disability, and terminated her because of her pregnancy.

The employee also claimed that after she informed her immediate supervisor that she was pregnant, her manager made negative and derogatory comments about the inconvenience caused by her pregnancy. She was told by her manager that the company could not hire temporary employees to accommodate her need to take pregnancy-related leave.

Approximately 1½ weeks after beginning unpaid pregnancy-related disability leave, she was told to remove her things from the workplace to “make room” for two newly hired employees. After giving birth and after being released to return to work by her physician, the company refused to reinstate the employee and terminated her employment.

Hawaii’s fair employment law protects pregnant employees by requiring employers to provide leave for an employee who has a pregnancy-related disability, with or without pay, for a reasonable time to be determined by the employee’s physician.

State law also requires reinstatement to the pregnant employee’s original job or to a position of comparable status and pay when the employee is released to return to work after pregnancy-related disability leave. Finally, state law prohibits termination because of pregnancy.

The case was settled in conciliation, after a determination that there was reasonable cause to believe that illegal discrimination occurred, but before litigation and before a final decision was issued by the commission.

“Although the identity of the parties is confidential at this stage, the settlement serves as an important reminder that pregnancy discrimination is unlawful,” said HCRC Executive Director William Hoshijo.“We used to see more pregnancy discrimination complaints, but now see fewer as employees and employers learn more about their rights and responsibilities under our civil rights laws.”