U.S. to send more troops to aid Afghan forces pressed by Taliban

Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

KABUL, Afghanistan — The U.S. Army will deploy hundreds of soldiers to the southern Afghan province of Helmand, where government forces have been pushed to the brink by Taliban militants, a military spokesman said Tuesday.

KABUL, Afghanistan — The U.S. Army will deploy hundreds of soldiers to the southern Afghan province of Helmand, where government forces have been pushed to the brink by Taliban militants, a military spokesman said Tuesday.

It will be the largest deployment of U.S. troops outside major bases in Afghanistan since the end of the NATO combat mission in 2014. Though the military insists that the soldiers will not take active combat roles, U.S. Special Operations forces have increasingly been drawn into the fighting in Helmand as one important district after another has fallen or been threatened by Taliban insurgents.

Col. Michael T. Lawhorn, a spokesman for the U.S. military in Afghanistan, said in a statement that the new deployment would provide protection for the current Special Operations troops in Helmand and give extra support and training for the 215th Corps of the Afghan National Army. Afghan forces in Helmand have taken heavy casualties in recent months and have been cut off by the Taliban in many places.

“Our mission,” Lawhorn said, “remains the same: to train, advise, and assist our Afghan counterparts, and not to participate in combat operations.”

He would not detail the number of troops or the unit involved in the deployment, citing Pentagon policy. But a senior U.S. military official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the unit being sent to Helmand, the 2nd Battalion, 87th Infantry, was slightly smaller than the usual battalion size of 700 to 800 soldiers.

The new troops will replace another unit that was already in Afghanistan, the official said, and will not add to the total number of U.S. troops in the country, which stands at roughly 9,800 service members.

Some Afghan officials have advocated a bigger role for U.S. troops for months.

The numbers being discussed “aren’t enough; 700 or so troops cannot solve such a big problem,” said Lt. Gen. Rahmatullah Raufi, a former Afghan army general who now commands the Afghan Border Police.

He nonetheless welcomed the U.S. decision to support the Afghan army and police in the south.

Aimal Faizi, who was a spokesman for former President Hamid Karzai, said that sending more U.S. troops to Helmand again would be a return to an “ill-advised” military strategy.

© 2016 The New York Times Company