Ten million words and counting

Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

Okay, folks, you and I know that the tax system we have in this country is pretty complicated. But did you know that the complexity has been expanding over the years so that the federal law and regulations are now over 10 million words?

Okay, folks, you and I know that the tax system we have in this country is pretty complicated. But did you know that the complexity has been expanding over the years so that the federal law and regulations are now over 10 million words?

Research at the national Tax Foundation tried to measure the complexity of the federal tax code by counting the number of words in it, and the Treasury Regulations, over the years. They concluded that today, the federal tax code is roughly six times as long as it was in 1955, while federal tax regulations are about 2.5 times as long.

The more there is to know about tax law, the harder it is for Americans to file their taxes quickly or correctly. Even the IRS’ own Taxpayer Advocate Service said in a 2012 report that tax complexity creates real costs for American taxpayers and the U.S. economy. The National Taxpayers Union Foundation estimated that Americans spend 6.1 billion hours and $233.8 billion complying with the tax code. Because of increasing tax complexity, more than 90 percent of taxpayers now hire professional tax preparers or use tax preparation software.

One of the many reasons why the tax laws have become so complicated is that the tax system is used to implement social policy and cure a number of other ills, not simply to get people to contribute to the cost of running our government. At the state level as well as the federal level, the tax system is used to give credits and incentives to businesses of various kinds; to provide monetary relief to the poor; and to penalize behavior seen as undesirable (take, for example, the federal excise taxes on gas guzzling vehicles and ozone-depleting chemicals).

And when people over the years come up with different approaches to solve the same problem, we don’t simply pick one approach, we use all of them. In Hawaii, for example, we attempt to provide poverty relief not by adjusting tax rates, but by giving a food/excise credit, by adding to it a credit for low-income household renters, by giving income tax credits and general excise tax exemptions for affordable housing, just to name a few.

Multiple approaches to an issue not only create complexity, because ordinary people as well as tax professionals need to know something about all of these approaches in order to prepare a tax return competently and correctly, but also create a very real possibility that multiple provisions kick in at the same time to produce a result that lawmakers may not have intended. We have written before about how we in Hawaii had three different provisions that were designed to extract a little more tax from the wealthy, with the result that a couple who earns the last dollar to reach the $200,000 AGI mark suddenly earns a Hawaii tax bill that is $3,671 higher. (One of those provisions will expire at the end of this year but we still have the other two.) These issues certainly plague the federal code as well.

“Keep it simple, stupid.” Does that sound familiar? Think 10 million good reasons for that phrase when it comes to taxes. It’s not easy, but it needs to be done.

Tom Yamachika is president of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii.