Eliminating risk from Texas Ebola case will take weeks, officials say
Los Angeles Times
| Sunday, October 5, 2014, 11:02 a.m.
DALLAS — Public health officials said Saturday that it would take more than a month before they can declare the risk of Ebola exposure eliminated here after a patient from Liberia was diagnosed last week with the first U.S. case of the deadly virus.
Dr. Tom Frieden, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said in a Saturday briefing that although the incubation period for Ebola is 21 days, officials usually wait twice as long before declaring that the risk has passed.
The U.S. Ebola event will not end until 42 days from the last day of exposure, he said, which would be when the Dallas patient, Thomas Eric Duncan, was taken to Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital and placed in isolation on Sept. 28.
If any new cases are discovered, Frieden said, the 42-day countdown would start again. The director of the state’s department of public health said plans were already being made for how to handle any future cases that may arise.
Officials have screened 114 people and were monitoring about 50 as of Saturday who may have been exposed to Duncan after he arrived in Dallas on Sept. 20. The monitoring includes taking temperatures and watching for signs of fever or other Ebola symptoms.
The group includes nine people considered at high risk of exposure, including health care workers and relatives of Duncan, he said.
Frieden said it was important to follow up with Duncan’s potential contacts during the “peak period” of about a week after exposure. As of Friday, officials have been able to reach all but one of the 50, including all nine considered high risk, Frieden said.
The four people Duncan was staying with in Dallas have been confined to an area home. They include his girlfriend Louise Troh, her 13-year-old son, and two young men — one a relative, another a friend.
“The way to stop Ebola in its tracks is contact tracing and follow-up,” Frieden said.
He said calls from some members of the public to stop commercial airline flights from West Africa and “seal ourselves off from the world” would not prevent cases like that of Duncan, who apparently did not have symptoms until days after he arrived.
In fact, he said, it could backfire: When Senegal recently halted flights to Liberia, he said, the move delayed the arrival of health care workers from the African Union.
He said exit screening of passengers at airports in West African countries has stopped 77 people from boarding departing flights, including 17 in September, though there was no follow-up monitoring to determine whether those individuals were later diagnosed with Ebola.
While the CDC is evaluating how West African arrivals are screened in the U.S., Frieden said, “nothing that we would have done in Liberia or the U.S. would have changed the course of the current situation.”
One thing that can be learned from Duncan’s case, he said, is that health care workers need to document a patient’s travel history.
“Hospitals across the nation have to learn from this experience. The travel history is very important to take right now,” said Dr. David Lakey, commissioner of the Texas Department of State Health Services.
Lakey then made a plea to health care workers listening to the briefing: “If you have a patient with fever or symptoms possibly related to Ebola, you have to ask that travel history.”
Officials at Texas Presbyterian Hospital conceded late Friday that doctors handling Duncan’s case initially turned him away from the hospital despite having been informed that he had recently arrived in to Texas from Africa.
Earlier in the week, hospital officials said emergency room doctors who first treated Duncan were not aware that had traveled from Africa, even though a nurse who questioned him had documented that fact.
They said the miscommunication was caused by a flaw in the electronic medical record system.
“We would like to clarify a point made in the statement released earlier in the week. As a standard part of the nursing process, the patient’s travel history was documented and available to the full care team in the electronic health record, including within the physician’s workflow,” the new hospital statement said.
“There was no flaw in the EHR in the way the physician and nursing portions interacted related to this event.”
Duncan arrived in Dallas from Liberia on Sept. 20. He first visited the hospital’s emergency room on Sept. 25 with a temperature of 100.1 degrees, abdominal pain, a headache and trouble urinating, according to a statement released by the hospital late Thursday.
A nurse asked Duncan whether he had traveled during the past four weeks, and he said he had been in Africa, according to the hospital statement.
The nurse recorded that information in Duncan’s electronic medical record. But the hospital initially said doctors who treated him used a separate record that did not include the travel history. The earlier statement, now revised, said doctors and nurses use separate “workflows.”
The man was sent home with a prescription for antibiotics, relatives said, but he got worse.
Duncan came to the U.S. to visit his girlfriend, Louise Troh, who lives with her 13-year-old son at the Ivy Apartments. Two other men — a relative and a family friend — were also staying at the apartment. Other relatives visited, including several children who attend four area public schools.
On Sept. 28, Duncan returned to the hospital by ambulance, was placed in isolation and two days later tested positive for Ebola. He remains in serious condition, and public health officials have narrowed the list of those he potentially contacted to 50, with 10 considered high risk, including the four he stayed with.
Hospital officials initially said they released Duncan’s medical information “in the interest of transparency, and because we want other U.S. hospitals and providers to learn from our experience.”
They also said they had changed the electronic medical record format in response to Duncan’s case, “relocated the travel history documentation to a portion of the (medical record) that is part of both workflows. It also has been modified to specifically reference Ebola-endemic regions in Africa,” the statement said.
“We have made this change to increase the visibility and documentation of the travel question in order to alert all providers. We feel that this change will improve the early identification of patients who may be at risk for communicable diseases, including Ebola,” it said.