WASHINGTON — The electronic cigarette market is booming both online and in brick-and-mortar retail outlets in ways hardly imaginable half a decade ago, and the growth continues to be largely unregulated, according to a series of studies published Monday in
WASHINGTON — The electronic cigarette market is booming both online and in brick-and-mortar retail outlets in ways hardly imaginable half a decade ago, and the growth continues to be largely unregulated, according to a series of studies published Monday in the journal Tobacco Control.
“It’s exploding,” said Shu-Hong Zhu, a professor in the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine at the University of California at San Diego, who co-authored one of nine studies funded by the National Cancer Institute. “There’s no sign of slowing down.”
Zhu and other researchers found a “staggering” proliferation of e-cigarette brands and flavors on the Internet in the past two years alone, with roughly 10 new brands and 240 new flavors arriving on the market every month. As of January, researchers trawling English-language websites identified 466 different e-cigarette brands and 7,764 individual flavors, from peppermint to pina colada.
But e-cigarettes have gained traction far beyond the Internet. Other researchers found that nearly a third of U.S. convenience stores, pharmacies and other retailers near schools sell e-cigarettes — a statistic that raises concern among some anti-smoking advocates who say there are too few barriers to youth access to the products.
“There’s this really rapid growth happening,” said Frank Chaloupka, director of the Health Policy Center at the University of Illinois at Chicago and author of several of Monday’s studies. “They are becoming available all over the place; they are being marketed aggressively; and they are cheap compared to normal cigarettes. But in terms of policy, there’s been very little done to control [the market] to this point.”
The increasing popularity of e-cigarettes — devices that generally resemble traditional cigarettes, but instead of burning tobacco, heat nicotine-laced liquid into a vapor that the user inhales — has been well documented in recent years.
But as the ever-changing and vast $2 billion market continues to expand, researchers involved in Monday’s studies said that the feverish growth underscores the need for more oversight as well as more research about the potential impact on public health.
At the least, Zhu and Chaloupka said, lawmakers should act quickly to pass measures to limit sales and marketing of e-cigarettes to minors and to ensure sound manufacturing practices.
“That’s the most important regulation that needs to be done, and it should be done quickly,” Zhu said.
Dozens of states have put in place some regulations for e-cigarettes, but the rules are neither uniform nor comprehensive. Fewer than two dozen states restrict youth access to the products, and only about a dozen have applied their smoke-free laws in public places to e-cigarettes, though some municipalities have instituted such rules. Only Minnesota taxes e-cigarettes.
In April, after years of speculation, the Food and Drug Administration said that it would for the first time begin regulating e-cigarettes, as well as cigars, pipe tobacco and hookahs.
If adopted, the government’s plan would force manufacturers to curb sales to minors, stop handing out free samples, place health warning labels on their products and disclose the ingredients. Makers of e-cigarettes would be banned from making health-related claims without scientific evidence.
But the FDA’s proposal would not seek to restrict online sales of e-cigarettes, curb television advertising or ban the widespread use of exotic flavors, which tobacco-control advocates have argued helps to attract young smokers, and which have been banned for traditional cigarettes. Given the sluggish nature of the federal rule-writing process and the prospect of litigation over the proposed rules, any final regulations are probably years away.
“The industry has no problem with regulation. The industry has a problem with inappropriate regulation,” said Cynthia Cabrera, executive director of the Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association, who had not yet seen the details of Monday’s studies. “If you have regulation that stifles this market, that’s not a good thing.”
Cabrera said her group supports a national age restriction on e-cigarettes, and that the majority of companies have been diligent in putting strict age-verification checks in place, both online and in retail outlets. She added that reputable e-cigarette makers adhere to stringent manufacturing practices.
Cabrera also said that many e-cigarette users are cigarette smokers who are trying to kick tobacco habits.
“If current smokers are switching over to vaporizing products, then great,” she said.
Zhu, the UC-San Diego researcher, agreed that e-cigarettes could end up providing a net benefit if they lessen use of tobacco. But he said that what’s missing is basic regulation of the industry and more reliable research into e-cigarettes’ long-term impact on health. “We want to regulate e-cigarettes in such a way that we help reduce cigarette smoking as much as possible,” he said.
Another study released Monday offered an additional glimpse at who seems to be attracted to e-cigarettes, at least in Europe. Researchers there analyzed nearly 27,000 e-cigarette users from 27 countries in the European Union.
The results showed that users were more likely to be young, between 15 and 24. They also were more likely to be cigarette smokers who have made at least one attempt to quit in the past year.
