Job gains slow down in March

Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

WASHINGTON — Job growth slowed sharply last month, raising fresh questions about the strength of the recovery and complicating, for the moment, President Barack Obama’s ability to run for re-election on the wave of a resurgent economy.

WASHINGTON — Job growth slowed sharply last month, raising fresh questions about the strength of the recovery and complicating, for the moment, President Barack Obama’s ability to run for re-election on the wave of a resurgent economy.

Employers nationwide added a modest 120,000 new positions in March, only about half the job gains in each of the previous three months, the Labor Department reported Friday. Some of the falloff, analysts said, reflected the fact that payrolls had been inflated in the winter because of unusually mild weather.

But the magnitude of the deceleration came as a disappointment to analysts, investors and politicians — and gave rise to the distinct possibility that hiring in the next few months could be relatively tepid.

“It raises the specter, ‘Are we back to where we’re just hanging on again?’” said Heidi Shierholz, a labor economist at the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal think tank in Washington.

The nation’s jobless rate dipped to 8.2 percent last month from 8.3 percent in February, but economists said the decline reflected workers’ dropping out of the labor force rather than a strengthening economy. Last month, the labor force shrank by 164,000, with the decrease attributable to female workers.

The falling percentage takes Obama closer to an unemployment rate of 8 percent — an important political marker. Republicans, including likely November opponent Mitt Romney, have frequently criticized his policies and his one-time prediction that unemployment would fall below 8 percent.

Economists and political scientists warn against using any one economic barometer — let alone a single month’s data — to predict electoral outcomes. But the latest report seemed to re-energize Romney, who declared the data “weak and troubling.”

Obama made only a passing reference to the report Friday as he addressed a White House forum on women and the workforce. He said he welcomed the news of the decline in the unemployment rate. But, as in past months when job growth was much stronger, he struck a tone of cautious optimism.

“It’s clear to every American that there will still be ups and downs along the way and that we’ve got a lot more work to do,” he said.

Yet the latest report raises questions for the president as he nears a critical period in his campaign. Research suggests major economic reports for the three summer months will likely set the tone for voters’ views on the economy, said Henry Brady, a political science professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

“That’s when you really want to have good jobs numbers, when you really want voters to get a sense that things are going well,” he said. “What he can’t afford, I think, is a series of reports that looks like the economy is languishing and allows Republicans to reignite the argument on the economy.”

Financial markets were closed Friday in observance of Good Friday, but stock futures traded sharply lower on the smaller-than-expected job gains. Many economists were forecasting job growth of 200,000 or slightly higher in March.

The unemployment figure has declined by 1.8 percentage points in the last 2 1/2 years, but other key labor market data suggest that much of the drop is not because people are finding work, but rather that “people are dropping out of the labor force,” said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington.

“That’s not a good story,” he said.

Elaine Durson, a 48-year-old substitute teacher in San Diego, has struggled to find a permanent job in recent years. She said she has kept herself afloat financially by taking on side jobs in housekeeping and yard work, and is in a long-term house-sitting arrangement that has allowed her to live rent-free.

“I just quit looking for a while because there was nothing out there,” Durson said Friday. “It’s highly discouraging because I’m never going to get a job as a teacher.”

The drop in the number of women in the labor force last month reflects their greater difficulty in the job market.

Friday’s report showed men garnered most of the job gains last month, as they have since the jobs recovery began in early 2010.

Manufacturing added 37,000 jobs in March — a third of them at auto companies.

Another big reason women have not fared as well is that the public sector has made huge cuts in the last two years, particularly in local education jobs. Women also are facing more competition from men for jobs in health care and other fields usually dominated by women.

Government payrolls were essentially flat in March, an encouraging sign that suggests greater stability in local and state finances.

Overall, the unemployment rate for working-age men 16 and older stood at 8.3 percent in March, unchanged from February but down from 9.5 percent in August. For women, the jobless figure was 8.1 percent in March, down from 8.2 percent in February and 8.5 percent last August.

The jobless rate, some analysts said, might bounce up a bit in the coming months as more people re-enter the job market, but that will be determined by the pace of hiring. The profit outlook for many big companies remains bright. At the same time, analysts are concerned about a slowdown in exports and high gas prices.