b0736 BC-RodeoTech 2ndLd-Writethru Adv04 09-01 0865

Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

Enhancing the view

Device captures rodeo physics, high-tech viewers

By SHAUN SCHAFER

The Associated Press


TULSA, Okla. — It’s a familiar scene at any rodeo: A bull bucks and spins, eventually flinging a cowboy into the air and onto the dirt.

On television replays, it takes on a whole new dimension: Viewers see an animated bar chart that details the acceleration and deceleration of the animal. It ultimately stops on a number that represents the power of a particular bull.

The on-screen graphics are another step in the high-tech evolution of sports broadcasting as programmers look for new ways to attract and retain viewers — and potentially tap into the business of providing information for gadgets beyond television.

The “X Power” graphics, which were included in some of ESPN’s rodeo coverage, were fed by data provided by gadgets glued to back of the bulls. The data are instantly retrieved and incorporated into graphics on the TV screen as the ride gets replayed.

“It’s kind of like jamming a master’s thesis on physics into each ride,” said Steve Wharton, director of new technology for Tulsa-based Winnercomm Inc., which created the technology and is the largest independent provider of programming for ESPN.

The puck-sized gadget on the bull is jammed with sensors that measure G-forces. It transmits the data in real time, allowing for quick presentation on the screen.

Winnercomm hopes to use a version of the device for its coverage of motorcycle stunts, providing viewers with an idea of the torque and G-forces riders feel.

Winnercomm plans to take all sorts of data and make it relevant to any fan, said Jim Wilburn, president and CEO. Whether it means using off-the-shelf items in a new way or spending millions to develop proprietary systems, the market demands innovation, he said.

“Once you know that Nolan Ryan throws a 98-mph fastball, you’re not that interested in seeing how fast he throws every pitch,” Wilburn said. “But you do want to know how well he is placing the ball and what he is doing to get strikes.”

There are also revenue possibilities. Digital technology allows more information than ever to be pumped into a television signal, giving broadcasters a chance to sell enhanced programming on TV as well as PCs, cell phones and handheld computers.

Over the years, viewers have responded well to sports coverage enhancements, such as the superimposed first-down line in football and the national flags displayed in swimming and speed skating lanes at the Olympics.

On-screen graphics help define modern sports coverage, said technology analyst Josh Bernoff, vice president of Forrester Research in Cambridge, Mass.

“If you watch a classic baseball game from 1978, the pitchers, the pinch hitters, the guys turning double plays are all pretty similar, but the difference is in the silly graphics. They aren’t computer images but are graphical overlays,” he said. “It’s as telling as black and white that this is video from another era.”

Winnercomm also has found a way to provide unusual camera angles in its sports coverage through its Skycam system, which features a camera that runs along a cable and shoots down at the action.

And it has changed the way fishing events are covered with its introduction of the real-time leaderboard, which instantly tells viewers how fishermen spread over a lake are doing.

“There are no floating bleachers in fishing,” said Dan Bowen, senior coordinating producer for outdoor programming at ESPN. “Often our events can fan out for hundreds of miles.”

Broadcasters are looking for any advantage they can get.

“There is a huge amount of competition now for viewers,” Bernoff said. “For any individual program, there are 120 other choices, and this means when Fox Sports faces up against ESPN or ‘CSI’ faces up against ‘Law and Order,’ you need any edge you can get to keep consumers’ attention.”

Bruce Anderson, chief strategy officer for Winnercomm, says the future in sports programming will be finding ways to plug content into formats other than traditional television coverage, such as cell phones, iPods and laptops.

The only concern of some sports fans is that all the new bells and whistles don’t interfere with their view of the competition.

Rodeo aficionado Leroy Simmons wants all the information he can get about his favorite sport.

“I like it all,” said Simmons, 73, of Kenwood. “I’m a nut about bull-riding. Anything they add to get more of it on TV is all right with me.”

Dionne Chancellor, Simmons’ granddaughter in Kenwood, said she liked the new technology and addition of graphics to bull riding. However, there are limits to what she would tolerate.

“If it’s done after the ride, while waiting on a score, it’s OK,” she said. “But I don’t want it covering up the ride.”

Enhancing the view

Device captures rodeo physics, high-tech viewers

By SHAUN SCHAFER

The Associated Press


TULSA, Okla. — It’s a familiar scene at any rodeo: A bull bucks and spins, eventually flinging a cowboy into the air and onto the dirt.

On television replays, it takes on a whole new dimension: Viewers see an animated bar chart that details the acceleration and deceleration of the animal. It ultimately stops on a number that represents the power of a particular bull.

The on-screen graphics are another step in the high-tech evolution of sports broadcasting as programmers look for new ways to attract and retain viewers — and potentially tap into the business of providing information for gadgets beyond television.

The “X Power” graphics, which were included in some of ESPN’s rodeo coverage, were fed by data provided by gadgets glued to back of the bulls. The data are instantly retrieved and incorporated into graphics on the TV screen as the ride gets replayed.

“It’s kind of like jamming a master’s thesis on physics into each ride,” said Steve Wharton, director of new technology for Tulsa-based Winnercomm Inc., which created the technology and is the largest independent provider of programming for ESPN.

The puck-sized gadget on the bull is jammed with sensors that measure G-forces. It transmits the data in real time, allowing for quick presentation on the screen.

Winnercomm hopes to use a version of the device for its coverage of motorcycle stunts, providing viewers with an idea of the torque and G-forces riders feel.

Winnercomm plans to take all sorts of data and make it relevant to any fan, said Jim Wilburn, president and CEO. Whether it means using off-the-shelf items in a new way or spending millions to develop proprietary systems, the market demands innovation, he said.

“Once you know that Nolan Ryan throws a 98-mph fastball, you’re not that interested in seeing how fast he throws every pitch,” Wilburn said. “But you do want to know how well he is placing the ball and what he is doing to get strikes.”

There are also revenue possibilities. Digital technology allows more information than ever to be pumped into a television signal, giving broadcasters a chance to sell enhanced programming on TV as well as PCs, cell phones and handheld computers.

Over the years, viewers have responded well to sports coverage enhancements, such as the superimposed first-down line in football and the national flags displayed in swimming and speed skating lanes at the Olympics.

On-screen graphics help define modern sports coverage, said technology analyst Josh Bernoff, vice president of Forrester Research in Cambridge, Mass.

“If you watch a classic baseball game from 1978, the pitchers, the pinch hitters, the guys turning double plays are all pretty similar, but the difference is in the silly graphics. They aren’t computer images but are graphical overlays,” he said. “It’s as telling as black and white that this is video from another era.”

Winnercomm also has found a way to provide unusual camera angles in its sports coverage through its Skycam system, which features a camera that runs along a cable and shoots down at the action.

And it has changed the way fishing events are covered with its introduction of the real-time leaderboard, which instantly tells viewers how fishermen spread over a lake are doing.

“There are no floating bleachers in fishing,” said Dan Bowen, senior coordinating producer for outdoor programming at ESPN. “Often our events can fan out for hundreds of miles.”

Broadcasters are looking for any advantage they can get.

“There is a huge amount of competition now for viewers,” Bernoff said. “For any individual program, there are 120 other choices, and this means when Fox Sports faces up against ESPN or ‘CSI’ faces up against ‘Law and Order,’ you need any edge you can get to keep consumers’ attention.”

Bruce Anderson, chief strategy officer for Winnercomm, says the future in sports programming will be finding ways to plug content into formats other than traditional television coverage, such as cell phones, iPods and laptops.

The only concern of some sports fans is that all the new bells and whistles don’t interfere with their view of the competition.

Rodeo aficionado Leroy Simmons wants all the information he can get about his favorite sport.

“I like it all,” said Simmons, 73, of Kenwood. “I’m a nut about bull-riding. Anything they add to get more of it on TV is all right with me.”

Dionne Chancellor, Simmons’ granddaughter in Kenwood, said she liked the new technology and addition of graphics to bull riding. However, there are limits to what she would tolerate.

“If it’s done after the ride, while waiting on a score, it’s OK,” she said. “But I don’t want it covering up the ride.”