Nation’s first soda tax could come to California city
Berkeley, Calif., could become the first U.S. city to tax sugary drinks.
The Berkeley City Council unanimously decided last week to put the 1-cent-per-ounce tax on the ballot this November. Approving the tax would mean a major defeat for the soda industry, which has spent millions to crush the effort nationwide.
More than a dozen local groups, from the NAACP to the Berkeley Dental Society, have pledged support for the “Berkeley vs. Big Soda” campaign, which legislators have pitched as a public health and social justice issue.
“Big Soda will claim that we are attacking a product that is beloved by low-income folks,” council member Laurie Capitelli said, “but those are the people who are coming to us and asking us to put this on the ballot.”
The American Beverage Association, Coca Cola and PepsiCo have led the battle against soda taxes, spending more than $40 million in 2010 alone to combat the effort in Congress. The industry also spent aggressively to fight off proposed taxes in more than a dozen states.
Illinois last tried to approve the tax in May, with lawmakers predicting up to $400 million in new revenue. But the bill failed after intense pressure from the Illinois Manufacturers Association, which warned of job losses across the state.
Some researchers say they have found evidence that the soda tax could work. A study published last month by the American Journal of Agricultural Economics found that a 6-cent tax on a 12-ounce can of Coke or Pepsi would mean an average reduction of 5,800 calories per person every year.
But the American Beverage Association has cast doubt that the tax would affect the country’s obesity epidemic. “Taxes don’t make people healthy,” the association’s public affairs director, Chris Gindlesperger, told reporters.
Two other towns in California, El Monte and Richmond, have already rejected similar measures. But activists in Berkeley — the state’s most liberal city - are optimistic.
California lawmakers have already targeted sugar as a health hazard. The state Senate approved a bill in May that would require safety warnings on beverages that contain more than 75 calories, though it has stalled in committee.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Stephens Media LLC or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Stephens Media LLC is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.