GMO papaya disclosure curbed
Judge Greg Nakamura granted a preliminary injunction Tuesday preventing Hawaii County from disclosing the identity and specific location of farms growing genetically engineered papaya.
The order in 3rd Circuit Court allows the county to maintain a registry of genetically modified organisms, but prevents information that could identify papaya growers from being released publicly.
Two growers of GMO papaya, Ross Sibucao and an unnamed plaintiff, challenged the requirement that they register with the county, arguing it would expose them to vandalism or other forms of economic harm.
One of the concerns was that the county lacked clear rules regarding what information it would release to the public as part of the program.
The injunction notes the need for a comprehensive policy addressing this issue. In regard to disclosure, it says releasing the specific locations of papaya farms would not “protect farmers of nongenetically engineered crops” because of the “limited risk” of cross-pollination and because GMO papaya is not prohibited.
The registry is part of a law the county adopted in December banning the open-air use and testing of GMO crops. Papaya farmers, who mostly grow varieties modified to be resistant to the ringspot virus, and others already growing modified crops are exempted from the open-air ban.
Kohala Councilwoman Margaret Wille, who introduced the bill the county adopted, said she is satisfied with the ruling, noting that the registry can continue.
“It addresses the concerns without undermining the right-to-know laws,” she said.
Wille noted the general location of farms could still be made public.
Sibucao didn’t immediately return a request for comment.
Nakamura previously issued a temporary restraining order preventing the registry from going into effect.
The injunction allows it to begin after 30 days.
A separate lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Honolulu is challenging the county’s restrictions on GMO crops.
Email Tom Callis at email@example.com.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Stephens Media LLC or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Stephens Media LLC is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.