DLNR responds to Keauhou lawsuit
Keauhou Bay isn’t too shallow to accommodate planned expanded use there, several proposed new moorings won’t prevent Keauhou Canoe Club from operating in the bay and the Department of Land and Natural Resources isn’t in violation of Chapter 343, the state statute that requires environmental assessments for state projects.
Those were just some of the denials DLNR made in its response to Keauhou Canoe Club’s lawsuit, filed in December, about the department’s plan to add moorings to the bay. The state filed its response Friday afternoon.
Deputy Attorney General Daniel Morris, in the state’s response argued several standard defenses in cases in which a person or entity sues the state, including sovereign immunity — the 11th Amendment protects states from some liability in some situations.
Morris said the final defense in the response is also a standard response to lawsuits against the state. That defense said that the state “is not liable to plaintiff for any claim based upon the failure to enforce or the adequacy of enforcement of statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations.”
Keauhou Canoe Club filed the lawsuit after DLNR moved ahead with plans to increase the number of moorings in Keauhou Bay from nine to 17. The bay isn’t big enough to accommodate that many moorings, the lawsuit said, and the work in the bay triggers the need for an environmental assessment on several counts. Projects conducted within the shoreline, projects using state or county funds and projects within designated historical areas are all typically required to complete an environmental assessment.
The response to the lawsuit also stated the canoe club lacks standing to bring the suit and failed to exhaust all administrative remedies before filing the lawsuit, and that the Circuit Court lacks jurisdiction to hear it.
The state did not yet respond to the canoe club’s motion for summary judgment. The state has until mid-May to do so. A hearing on that motion is scheduled for that month.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Stephens Media LLC or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Stephens Media LLC is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.