Change of plea to be discussed in road rage case
KEALAKEKUA — A plea agreement is being discussed for former Hawaii County police officer Michael Dubberstein, who was charged with assault in connection with a 2014 road rage incident in Ka’u.
On Thursday, Deputy Prosecutor Stephen Frye and Dubberstein’s attorney, Brian De Lima, appeared before 3rd Circuit Court Judge Melvin Fujino for a motion to dismiss the grand jury indictment and a motion to dismiss the first-degree assault charge.
Ultimately, De Lima requested a continuance for a change of plea.
“Our objective is to have an agreement that resolves the case and results in no conviction for Mr. Dubberstein,” De Lima said outside the courtroom.
Earlier this week, De Lima filed a 104-page motion with the 3rd Circuit Court indicating the indictment in the case should be dismissed because the state presented prejudicial, false, misleading and hearsay testimony during the grand jury proceedings, which improperly influenced the grand jury.
Frye filed a motion in opposition to dismiss the indictment.
“The defendant’s motion contains bold accusations that the state allowed perjured and false testimony to be presented during the grand jury proceedings,” according to Frye’s filing. “However, the defendant’s motion fails to analyze with specificity how the statements may have been false.”
Dubberstein is set to appear in court again on May 24.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Stephens Media LLC or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Stephens Media LLC is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.